Does ‘Better’ corporate governance cause better firm performance? Essay

A study had been generated and said that performance argon affected either the implemented brass instrument is good or severeness In summary, our resultants are as follows. First, we do not find significantly different firm performance between firms with good changes in governance and firms with foul changes in governance, except for isolated instances. This result holds for all the three samples (i. e. the Moderate mathematical operation sample, the Ab usually Bad Performance sample and the Abnormally Good Performance sample).Second, both good and bad changes in governance are followed by positive as well as negative changes in industry-adjusted performance. Indeed, more than 50% of the firms with good governance changes exhibit negative industry-adjusted performance. Third, we find that both good and bad changes in governance lead to significant changes in performance. Therefore, if one restricts the abstract to only good changes in governance or only bad changes in governan ce, one would incorrectly conclude that changes in governance lead to changes in performance.Fourth, we observe that different firms vary in directions of governance changes when they experience the same direction in performance changes. A same firm also a lot simultaneously changes its different governance characteristics in conflicting directions (i. e. both good and bad governance changes). Last, our measure for Aggregate Governance Change confirms the first result for individual governance measure that the firms with good changes in governance do not have better performance than the firms with bad changes in governance.Our results present beardown(prenominal) evidence against the null hypothesis that better governance causes better firm performance. Note that our results do not imply that governance is irrelevant. Instead, it implies that firms are endogenously optimizing their governance expression in response to patent and unobservable firm characteristics. These results a re consistent with the strand of the literature that has shown each governance mechanism to be related to observable and unobservable firm characteristics. The statement proves that all decisions and change causes an effect to a commerce.This however means that every day, new challenge may face the community. It is normal for demands, and conflicts to happen. The issue that is important is the management and the organization as a whole would stand as one and face all the challenges with a positive picket to solve it. From the study that weve conducted, the writer concluded that the main cause of business failure are the managements negligence, improper planning. Conducting good and bad governance both causes changes in an organization so its better to be alert in all times.Decision making should be done conservatively and the organization should choose the people who they will trust. Recommendations Having all the different factors of company failures and the experiences of the UK Industry Company and MISnet Inc. , the writer recommend that the top management should not comport the needs of the company for granted but they should also be careful in giving. Decisions should be done care. The financial capacity must(prenominal) alship canal be monitored and all departments must always be alert in all times.The management should encourage the workers to work with passion, be loyal to the company and work tump over and hand to achieve all the goals that the company has. It is also important that the people working in the company are capable of doing their assigned job description. Workers are the companys working hand. It is a must that the workers are at their best to bring the best product that the company wants to have. Investment has been always a part of life in a company. When it comes to people investment, the company must be sure that spending money for a person must be worth paying for.Hence, the company must be very careful of choosing the right people to trust and the right people for a certain job. enfranchisement is always a must. Never let any situation happen without any documentation. All reports and transactions must be done with papers and with the word-paintings (Person in Charge) signature to make it even more valid and powerful in meetings and agreements. Even important conversations must be recorded and enter to ensure understanding between parties. Meetings are also important and dissemination of information is a must.Memoranda should always be disseminated to all employees. Discipline has been an electric outlet in all companies. The company must enforce a strict and fair rule and policies that the employees must do in order to organize a company. Make them come in the company on time and finish their work fast. Over time on work is not a cadence of quality service, it only show two things its either the worker cant handle too many work because of pressure or multi tasking or the worker cant finish the wo rk on time because he/she wasted it. The company should always have a room for improvement.Benchmarking or company observation is a big help to improve the companys usual workflow and environment. People used to compare one thing to another. Make it a positive way of upgrading the company. Have a group of trusted people to assist the company to make improvements. Lastly, a company must have a goal or mission. No company must have an inspiration to look forward to. Set a series of mission, vision, the companys commitment, core values and principles so that the workers will live by the companys principles and for the companys goal.There are series of ways and measurements that can be done through quality audits, and meetings. Implement good data management and all department management. Some analyst says that most business fails after its 8 years of operation it still depends on the teamwork of the people in an organization and its willingness to survive.Reference Websites N. K. Chida mbaran, Darius Palia , Yudan Zheng , Does fall in Corporate Governance Cause Better Firm Performance? , 2006, viewed on 28 January 2008. Greg Bustin, Why Companies Fail?Take Charge How Leaders Profit From Change 2005, viewed on 28 January 2008. Susan M. Heathfield, Performance steering Process Checklist http//humanresources. about. com/od/performancemanagement/a/perfmgmt. htm viewed on 27 January 2008 Management, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia viewed on 28 January 2008.NEERAJ BHARGAVA, Good Governance is Good Business, The hem in Street Journal, 2006 http//online. wsj. com/article/SB115671755403846763-search. html? KEYWORDS=Good+Governance&COLLECTION=wsjie/6month viewed on 29 January 2008 Good Governance Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia viewed on 28 January 2008 herbaceous plant Greenberg Corporate Governance as a riskiness Factor.Finding Relationship between Performance and a companys board of directors 2007 http//www. marketwatch. com/ give-and-take/story/weighing-r isk-factors-bad-corporate/story.aspx? guid=%7B55BF9816-8CC4-4570-8D6D-13EBD531F5CE%7D viewed on 28 January 2008 Process size up viewed on 27 January 2008 Customer Audit http//www. understanding. co. uk/customeraudit. htm viewed on 27 January 2008 Final Assembly Supplier Audit Report http//images. apple. com/supplierresponsibility/pdf/Final_Assembly_Audit. pdf (2007) viewed on 28 January 2008 West Cumbria Council for Voluntary Service, Effective Meetings (2005) http//www. westcumbriacvs. org. uk/docs/FactSheet4. pdf viewed on 28 January 2008.Books Terry Collison How to Write an Effective Business Plan in good Three Hours, 1993 Paul Todd, Swot Equity and Trust (Swot)(Gaunt 5Rev Ed edition (October 1996)) Jeffrey Abrahams, The Mission Statement Book 301 Corporate Mission Statements from Americas pinnacle Companies (TEN SPEED PRESS Rev Sub edition (1999)) ARTICLES Evangeline Santos How Failures Happen IT Tribune (Philippines December 2007) Bruce G. Posner Why Companies Fail In c. com Magazine (June 1993) Manuel Toledo Coping With Business Failure A Kaizen advent Ginto (Philippines 2004) Term Papers.Hubert Ooghe, Sofie De Prijcker Failure process and causes of company bankruptcy (Universiteit Gent) Wayne L. Welsh CPA, Best Practices For Good Management Office of the Legislative Author General (2001) R Massey, J Widdows, K Bhattacharya, R Shaw, D Hart, D Law, W Hawes, Insurance Company Failure http//www. actuaries. org. uk/files/pdf/giro2002/Massey. pdf viewed on 28 January 2008 Conference John Hunter, Natalia Isachenkova Aggregate Economy Risk and Company Failure An Examination of the UK Quoted Firms in the Early 1990s Department of Economics and Finance (Brunel University).