Analysis and Evaluation of the Relationship Between Nora

analytic recollecting and Exploration of the birth surrounded by Nora and Torvald as portrayed in A Dolls House As a reader, the relationship between Torvald and Nora cope withmed authentic eachy interesting to me. While it fronts matchless steering on the surface, it is unfeignedly un care essenti all in ally. I chose to study this because I think, there is a great deal to explore in order to try and understand the matrimonial dynamic between Nora and Torvald. in that respect are so many issues that go into wherefore a relationship is theone that it is except I will focus on three very influential aspects in the book the Victorian sexuality roles, societal expectations and the melodic theme of go out, as easily as the individual personalities and beliefs two the spouses held. In assessing the relationship which Torvald and Nora share, it is approximately signifi bungholet that we consider the Victorian gender roles at the era. In a time such as that one, bo th(prenominal) Torvald and Nora would be pres authorizedd and bred to mold themselves according to these gender rules.When youre raised a certain way and it is ingrained in you that you are expected to be a certain way, you will. Additionally, they would also expect their spouse to do the like. In Victorian times, there were two clear roles that a man and muliebrity were alleged(a) to frolic in a conjugal union. Essentially, the man was responsible for protecting, guarding and most of all, ensuring financial security for his wife. This can be observed in A Dollshouse several times. A blatant example is how Nora receives all her spending bullion from Torvald.Like a child, she receives allowances and sums of money to take care of the household expenses as well as for herself. To exemplify, I extracted an interaction between the couple that takes place when Torvald presents Nora with a sum of money. Nora Torvald, Thank you Thisll defy me going for a long time Torvald Well, you must see that it does. As a husband, Torvald also restricts her from doing things which he thinks arent good for her but she likes to do and these can be as unprofitable as eating macaroons.To quote Torvald, when hes questioning Nora closely whether or not shes eaten macaroons and she denies the accusation, Torvald says No, I screw you wouldnt, besides youve precondition me your word. This little(a) instance goes a long way in portraying his role in the relationship as someone who controls her and who is divinatory to determine her actions. Another instance when Torvald acts according to his gender role is when he feels he pauperisms to guide Nora to teach her how to dance for the Tarantella.And not altogether does he do that, but he revels in this role. When Nora presents a frontal of desperately needing Torvalds help to dance the tarantella, he says This evening, Ill be wholly and entirely at your service- you poor, helpless creature. This leads me to talk to the high est degree a womans role in the Victorian society and how it influences Nora in her relationship with her husband. If a husband was expected to provide for his wife, similarly, a woman was supposed to live it in gratitude and forever indebted to him.She was to abide by his standards and corroborate the house comfortable for him and essentially, be in his service all the time. This can really be observed in A Dolls House where Nora is perpetually trying to be the ideal wife to Torvald. In Act 2 of the play, we can quote Nora saying to Kristina- Sh Heres Torvald coming back. Look, go in and sit with the children for a bit- Torvald cant bear to see dressmaking. Shes perpetually trying to appear a certain way, but to her feature husband in her give birth home.When shes undergoing hardships like when she was working because when they were in debt or when shes distraught, she never lets him realize it. As a reader, one can observe this when Nora is describing to Kristina how she coul d not tell Torvald of her loan and says Torvald would be repulsively hurt and humiliated if he thought he owed anything to me. Itd misconduct everything between is, and our hunchly happy home would never be the same again. This was also something that was expected of women in the era in that their personal struggles werent ever really shared with their husbands.This may seem really odd to us but at the time it may be because marriages in itself seldom took place because two people were in love, but because it was more of an arrangement for both of them to adhere to standards put up by society. So while Nora and Torvald do appear to be in love in its true form, we energise to remember as readers, that he does save in mind her background, her pay backs prehistoric and this is because these things really mattered when choosing a spouse. He would never let it go. Even when they are having a altogether irrelevant and pleasant discussion, Torvald finds a way to incorporate the un pleasant past of her family. Just like your father- always on the look out for all the money you can get, but the moment you have it, it seems to slip by your fingers and you never know what becomes of it. Well, I must take you as you are- its in your blood. This brings me to the second aspect that I studied which was holding up an image to society and adhering to its standards. This played a huge role in their relationship many times during the play so we can amaze to understand how much it affected their marriage. The concept of what will people think arises so many times.The most notable occurrence demonstrating this is towards the end of the play when Torvald finds out more or less Noras lie and alternatively than trying to keep their relationship together out of genuine affection for Nora and him truly not indispensablenessing her to leave because he loves her, he wants her to stay and put up a facade as a married couple middling so they s savings bank appear that way to society. This is really when we can see what their marriage really means to him. More than anything , it was something to show to society and perchance this is why they always felt the need to be the ideal couple.It demo his willingness to brush their problems under the rug to maintain an image to society. And doing this isnt the way any healthy relationship should be, so from this we can conclude that his antecedent was elsewhere. And he says this too. From now on, forget happiness. Now its astir(predicate) saving the remains, the wreckage, the appearance. The marriage in itself meant less to him than appearance which really drives a reader to consider again how he interacted with his wife and the genuineness of their marriage as a whole.The idea of loving a woman like Nora was more grievous to Torvald than actually giving her the love she deserved and this is indicated when Nora says Youve never loved me, youve whole found it pleasant to be in love with me. Also, the idea of maintaining an image for society comes in when Nora wants to kill herself instead of telling the truth round her debt. She doesnt want society to look down upon her and her family, she doesnt want Torvald to be looked down upon so she feels that is the only way out.And this shows how strongly she feels closely society as opposed to herself and her husband as individuals. But Torvald seems to have a really determined moral compass. He feels strongly close crimes, lying and debt . He expresses this in act 1 when he says Nora, you know what I think about that sort of thing. No debts, no borrowing. Theres something constrained, something ugly even, about a home thats founded on borrowing and debt. You and I have managed to keep clear up till now and we shall still do so for the little time that is left. Torvald makes sure that his wn views are heard in his relationship, which in this case only acted as a catalyst to Noras breakdown because she was doing and listening to two sev eral(predicate) things. Lastly, I wanted to study Torvald and Noras own individual personalities and beliefs which plausibly play the most important role in their marriage. What else can explain the need for Nora to tell little lies like eating macaroons behind Torvalds back or her strong notion to kill herself when shes in debt and does not want it to affect her current family. Torvalds aversion to debt and views about Noras family also come out in the same way.In a way , maybe their respective upbringings played a role in how they acted in their marriage. Nora was brought up being repressed, her father wanted to her to act a certain way and always ensured that his opinions were her opinions. From there she was married and fuck offd some the same thing. And this constant repression and control over her life, indicated when Nora says Ive been your doll wife here, just as at home I was papas doll child, might be what subconsciously drives her to do things like eat macroons and fe el the need to hide such a thing such as a debt from her husband.Even in her initial conversation with Mrs. Lindt, she or so describes the whole experience of the secret loan as something exciting because for her it is that different because of what her life has always been. When Kristina inquires whether Nora obtained her large sum of money through the lottery, Nora responds A lottery Pooh-where would be the glory in that ? In the same way, Nora experiences how her father was a victim of society when he was dishonest and committed a crime.. Just remember the wicked things they put in the paper about Papa- how cruelly they slandered him. She doesnt want the same thing to happen to her own family and this drives her to react the way that she does- because like anyone else her childhood affects her even in her matureness Incidentally, Torvalds strong opinions also influence their relationship in that she feels the need to hide things because she knows how he feels about them and he doesnt make it appear as though hed understand.His opinions were supposed to be hers and his beliefs were supposed to be Noras. You arranged everything to suit your own tastes says Nora in the third act, and so I came to have the same tastes as yours.. or I pretended to. Im not quite sure which. His strong abuse towards loans and bad deeds are two examples of the same. The most important idea of their individual views is Torvalds physical attraction and lust for Nora in that it really limits the depth of their relationship.She loves him for all the right reasons and genuinely accepted him as a husband and would sacrifice anything for him, even her life. The way he interacts with her though, is always a more superficial manner pertaining to her beauty and physical appearance quite a than as a person. In their most intense moments of interaction we experience before he finds the letter, he speaks to her through a veil of inclination and lust When I watched you swaying and becok oning in the tarantella, it set my blood on inflame till I couldnt bear it any longer Thats why I brought you home so early. Rather than treating her on a human level, he objectifies her and treats her as a possession or incidentally, a doll not his partner or equal. How fascinating you are, you lovely little thing Maynt I look at my dearest treasure? At all the beauty that belongs to no one but me- thats all my very own Nora is something Torvald feels like hes proud to own, rather than as a person on her own. Which is really what she struggles with in the end, herself as a person.How he talked to her and how he belittled her , how she was treated that way to the highest degree her whole life influenced the outcome of the play in that she finally realizes that shes her own person, not a counterpart to any man. Youve committed a grievous sin against me its your fault Ive made nothing of my life. . This demonstrates Noras final revelation in the climax of the play. To conclude, id like to mention that a great deal goes into their marriage and how it ended in the play. But by studying a few aspects it gave me a better understanding as to why they were a certain way.